Infant Immunization

by admin on January 22, 2011

If you are a registered nurse, or are studying in a nurse practitioner program, then it is essential to keep abreast of development in medicine, because new medicines arise all the time and your studies are never done. A recent article by Reuters describes the impact of new vaccination practices, which can reduce infant mortality by protecting them from rotavirus.

Several countries, including the United States, Mexico, and Australia, are now immunizing infants as standard practice. The new procedure has caused a “steep and swift” decrease in the number of deaths due to the lethal and persistent diarrhea that often accompanies baby infection with retrovirus. The strategy now is not to protect the individual, but to wipe out the viruses ability to multiply and spread, by immunizing as many infants as possible. Less disease, exponentially less chance for infection. This approach has been referred to as “herd immunity.”

Although this effect may seem obvious, it is simply more expensive to try to vaccinate everyone. Medical proponents constantly try to persuade lawmakers in many countries to subsidize vaccinations, and lawmakers are reluctant because money might be wasted for little result. These studies, which were published in a subsidiary to The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, amount to ammunition for the lobbyists. The World Health Organization wants the retrovirus vaccine everywhere in the globe, but many undeveloped countries simply cannot afford it. Various agencies hope to raise enough money in donations to introduce the vaccine even in third world countries.

The real proving grounds for the vaccine were in Mexico and Australia. Mexico is still a developing country, but has improved enough in recent years to afford new health programs. It has initiated universal immunization for babies, and noticed a total drop in the incident of rotavirus by 40 percent. Australia seems to be leading, with a roughly 90 percent decrease. This is better than the United States, which averaged about a 70 percent decrease.

If you want to stay abreast on the most recent advances, the last thing you want is to attend a nurse practitioner school that is behind the times. Consider these options instead….

nurse practitioner requirements ~ clinical nurse educator certification ~ nurse practitioner school ~ womens health career ~ family nurse practitioner programs online ~ adult nurse practitioner certification

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Nessie G. March 10, 2011 at 1:48 pm

How do you know if a nurse practitioner school is up to par when it comes to standards and curriculum? I’m enrolled in a nurse practitioner program but I am not satisfied in the level of learning I get. This topic has only been skimmed over and not really thoroughly discussed, so I’m not so much aware that we lag behind Australia in stopping the spread of diarrhea.

Reply

Abigail March 14, 2011 at 10:24 am

A good nurse practitioner program instills in you the importance of being on top of developments, not just in medicine, but also other issues related to your field of study. So make sure that you are enrolled in a good nurse practitioner program, or you’re basically wasting money.

Reply

Gabriel S. March 14, 2011 at 11:51 am

It just goes to show that you don’t only need to know more about health, but everything with regards to it. Nurse practitioner schools help you in this, by presenting you with these cases and letting you ponder on it with an open and critical mind.

Reply

Ben Atkins March 15, 2011 at 1:23 pm

Hi Nessie G. Unfortunately, there is no easy answer for your question. It depends on the specific focus you are interested in, whether it’s family nursing, pediatric nursing, or other nurse practitioner programs that you are interested in. For more information, you can get great insights from http://www.nursepractitionerprogramguides.org

Reply

Leave a Comment

Next post: